<html dir="ltr">
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=Windows-1252">
<style>
<!--
@font-face
        {font-family:Calibri}
@font-face
        {font-family:Tahoma}
@font-face
        {font-family:Arial Bold}
@page WordSection1
        {margin:72.0pt 72.0pt 72.0pt 72.0pt}
p.MsoNormal
        {margin:0cm 0cm 0pt;
        font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";
        font-size:11pt}
li.MsoNormal
        {margin:0cm 0cm 0pt;
        font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";
        font-size:11pt}
div.MsoNormal
        {margin:0cm 0cm 0pt;
        font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";
        font-size:11pt}
a:link
        {color:blue;
        text-decoration:underline}
span.MsoHyperlink
        {color:blue;
        text-decoration:underline}
a:visited
        {color:purple;
        text-decoration:underline}
span.MsoHyperlinkFollowed
        {color:purple;
        text-decoration:underline}
p.MsoAcetate
        {margin:0cm 0cm 0pt;
        font-family:"Tahoma","sans-serif";
        font-size:8pt}
li.MsoAcetate
        {margin:0cm 0cm 0pt;
        font-family:"Tahoma","sans-serif";
        font-size:8pt}
div.MsoAcetate
        {margin:0cm 0cm 0pt;
        font-family:"Tahoma","sans-serif";
        font-size:8pt}
span.EmailStyle17
        {font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";
        color:windowtext}
span.BalloonTextChar
        {font-family:"Tahoma","sans-serif"}
.MsoChpDefault
        {font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif"}
-->
</style><style id="owaParaStyle">
<!--
p
        {margin-top:0px;
        margin-bottom:0px}
-->
</style>
</head>
<body lang="EN-AU" link="blue" vlink="purple">
<div style="direction:ltr; font-family:Tahoma; color:#000000; font-size:10pt">
<p>Hi Lauren,</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>I have not yet finished reading the APS submission concerning the revisions to DSM5, however, I am already concerned about the 'tone' taken by the APS. This positive&nbsp;'tone'&nbsp;is in contrast, as you mentioned, with the outpourings of criticisms from many other
 high profile organizations.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>I am also concerned about the lowering of diagnostic thresholds, the overemphasis on biological and medical factors&nbsp;(whilst ignoring cultural, social, political and systemic factors) as well as some of the problematic categories of diagnosis, such as Female
 Sexual Dysfunction and&nbsp;Paraphilic Coercive Disorder, among others.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>What do others think?</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>Warm&nbsp;regards,</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>Kyli</p>
<div style="font-family:Times New Roman; color:#000000; font-size:16px">
<hr tabindex="-1">
<div id="divRpF400594" style="direction:ltr"><font color="#000000" size="2" face="Tahoma"><b>From:</b> commpsych-bounces@lists.curtin.edu.au [commpsych-bounces@lists.curtin.edu.au] on behalf of Lauren Breen [Lauren.Breen@curtin.edu.au]<br>
<b>Sent:</b> Wednesday, 18 July 2012 12:51 PM<br>
<b>To:</b> Commpsych (commpsych@lists.curtin.edu.au)<br>
<b>Subject:</b> [Commpsych] DSM5<br>
</font><br>
</div>
<div></div>
<div>
<div class="WordSection1">
<p class="MsoNormal">Here is the Australian Psychological Society’s submission concerning the revisions to DSM5
<a href="http://www.psychology.org.au/Assets/Files/APS-DSM-5-submission.pdf" target="_blank">
http://www.psychology.org.au/Assets/Files/APS-DSM-5-submission.pdf</a></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">&nbsp;</p>
<p class="MsoNormal">In my reading of the document, the APS seems to be quite positive – e.g., the APS “sees the DSM-5 revision as implementing several improvements in the conceptualisation and definition of psychiatric disorders” – which contrasts with the
 at times scathing criticisms levelled by many other professional organisations at the DSM5 revisions.</p>
<p class="MsoNormal">&nbsp;</p>
<p class="MsoNormal">I’m concerned about comments such as “The APS has no problem about the Paraphilic Coercive Disorder…” – well I am concerned. Doesn’t this label potentially legitimate rape as a mental illness? Same for Pedophilia Disorder. I’m also concerned
 about the reduced thresholds for diagnosis, the reification of mental disorder, the medicalization of difference, the concern about pharmaceutical kickbacks etc etc.
</p>
<p class="MsoNormal">&nbsp;</p>
<p class="MsoNormal">Thoughts?</p>
<p class="MsoNormal">&nbsp;</p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span>Kind regards,</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span>Lauren</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family:'Arial Bold'"></span>&nbsp;</p>
<p class="MsoNormal">&nbsp;</p>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<p style="font-size:10.0pt; font-family:&quot;Arial Narrow&quot;,&quot;sans-serif&quot;; color:black">
This email, including any attachment, is intended solely for the use of the intended recipient. It is confidential and may contain personal information or be subject to legal professional privilege. If you are not the intended recipient any use, disclosure,
 reproduction or storage of it is unauthorised. If you have received this email in error, please advise the sender via return email and delete it from your system immediately. Victoria University does not warrant that this email is free from viruses or defects
 and accepts no liability for any damage caused by such viruses or defects.</p>
</body>
</html>